Architecture Portal

Architecture in practice

Compare and improve your architecture approach.

Adrian Sutherland · Version 1.0 · · © 2005–2026

Choose a starting point

Systems

Connect applications, integration and software.

Security

Examine risk, authority and controls, including Zero Trust.

A useful starting point

When a training provider cancels a course, staff need to agree alternatives with learners and decide who will handle each case. The change may also affect information, software and recovery arrangements. Architecture connects those decisions. The method determines how people make, check and revisit them.

Architecture Portal helps architects compare and improve their existing approaches. Use the guidance to examine delivery speed, quality, support and the effort of change. Adapt its terms and records to the way your team works. The assessment guide separates the quality of the architecture from the performance of the method.

A framework and an example

A Simple Architectural Framework (ASAF) helps you examine the concerns a decision affects, the work involved and the description needed. The worked example follows a training provider from a process-only proposal to a possible later software service. It connects the decisions across the framework’s aspects.

The templates pair blank records with completed examples. The blueprint brings the service architecture together across the aspects, with named objects, diagrams and reusable records.

Learning from use

The fictional service’s proposed checks remain unrun. Working projects provide separate implementation examples with their own status and limitations. Experience of use, change and retirement will help test which architectural choices remain useful over time.

About this edition

Refreshed for the September 2026 website update. This edition develops the earlier Architecture Portal and ASAF material; the fictional worked example was added in 2026.

Scope, limitations and next checks

Status and accountability

Read this page with its boundaries visible

Status

In development

Last reviewed

Intended users

  • Architects comparing and adapting their existing approach

Non-goals

  • A mandatory method or a prescribed implementation

Limitations

  • Guidance; the fictional service has not been implemented and its proposed checks remain unrun.

Next evidence sought

  • Review the reader journey and apply the records with a practising architect.